Article: Understanding the downsides of AI monitoring: Balancing privacy and productivity


Understanding the downsides of AI monitoring: Balancing privacy and productivity

The feeling of being monitored can influence how employees approach learning. It's a distinct experience to learn when genuinely curious and interested compared to learning under the perceived scrutiny and evaluation, noted Vijay Kumar Jamwal and Srinivasa Bharathy.
Understanding the downsides of AI monitoring: Balancing privacy and productivity

In an era marked by technological advancements, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping our work environment. AI has undoubtedly brought a multitude of benefits, from streamlining tasks to improving efficiency. However, the implementation of AI for monitoring employees and their work has raised concerns about privacy and its implications on the workforce. So, let’s explore the intricacies of AI monitoring, the impact on employee well-being, legal considerations, and the advantages it brings.

The employee perspective

As AI monitoring tools become more prevalent in workplaces, it's crucial to examine how employees perceive this technology. According to research conducted between March 2020 and June 2023, there was a 54% increase in the demand for employee surveillance software. This surge in demand may be an indicator of the broader implementation of AI monitoring in the workforce.

Many employees who are aware of being monitored through AI reported that their mental health was negatively affected. In contrast, those not subjected to monitoring reported better mental health. Additionally, a significant percentage of those being monitored stated that their workplace had a detrimental effect on their mental well-being.

Vijay Kumar Jamwal, Head of HR at Biz2X, expressed his concerns about AI monitoring, stating that it could create an environment where employees feel constantly surveilled. This sense of constant surveillance can hinder creativity, stifle genuine learning experiences, and foster a culture of compliance rather than understanding.

“Employees' perceptions of being watched can also affect their approach to learning. Learning out of genuine curiosity and interest is significantly different from learning because one feels watched and evaluated. An environment of constant monitoring can discourage employees from making mistakes, which are essential for the learning process,” he stated. 

Legal and ethical implications

AI monitoring tools provide employers with valuable insights into employee performance and business operations. However, this practice raises several legal and ethical questions. For instance, monitoring remote workers for productivity can introduce challenges related to privacy and data protection.

Srinivasa Bharathy, CEO and MD of Adrenalin eSystems, emphasised that excessive surveillance could compromise individual liberties and civil rights. Relying heavily on AI for decision-making might perpetuate or exacerbate biases, as these systems learn from historical data, which can contain prejudiced information.

Effectively managing AI bias involves training models on diverse datasets that genuinely reflect real-world scenarios, encompassing a wide range of examples to counteract inherent biases in the training data.

Furthermore, “the implementation and upkeep of AI systems often entail significant expenses, especially for smaller organisations. Striking the right balance between the benefits and drawbacks of AI monitoring is essential for responsible and efficient use. Human oversight to rectify potential biases and uphold ethical AI decision-making can be a valuable addition,” said Mr Bharathy. 

The Fear of job obsolescence

Beyond concerns about privacy, AI monitoring has also introduced the fear of job obsolescence. A survey conducted in April 2023 found that more than one-third of respondents feared that AI might make some or all of their job duties obsolete. This fear of job loss to AI has led to increased stress among employees.

According to the survey, nearly two-thirds of those worried about AI's impact reported feeling tense or stressed during the workday. This stress often leads to burnout symptoms, such as irritability, emotional exhaustion, and decreased motivation.

Employees who worry about AI's influence on their jobs are also more likely to report that their job negatively affects their mental health. These concerns highlight the need for organisations to foster trust, innovation, and a genuine learning environment to mitigate the stress and anxiety related to AI monitoring.

The advantages of AI monitoring

While AI monitoring has its downsides, it also offers numerous advantages, which should not be overlooked. AI-powered employee monitoring can significantly enhance security, streamline operations, and provide valuable insights into employee performance.

  • AI tools can determine each employee's most productive working methods by analysing digital interactions, workflow development, and collaboration patterns. They can identify peak performance times, bottlenecks, and the need for breaks, ultimately helping employees work more efficiently.
  • AI surveillance technology can accurately monitor employee conduct and performance, reducing the possibility of human error. This can lower legal and regulatory risks, protect a company's brand and financial well-being, and enhance accuracy in decision-making.
  • Additionally, AI monitoring software personalises work methodologies based on each employee's preferences and habits. This personalisation increases engagement, reduces burnout, and aligns work with employees' circadian rhythms.
  • AI time tracking software can track employees' actions and performance in real time, providing companies with accurate and current data. This data can help businesses identify areas in which employees excel and areas where they may require more assistance or training.
  • AI monitoring software also plays a vital role in the era of remote work, ensuring that employees remain connected, engaged, and productive, regardless of their physical location. It offers real-time feedback, fostering a culture of continuous learning and aiding in employee skill development.

Navigating the complex terrain of AI monitoring

AI monitoring is a powerful tool that can significantly enhance productivity and business operations. However, it also poses challenges related to privacy, job security, and ethical concerns. Striking the right balance between the advantages and disadvantages of AI surveillance is crucial for creating a work environment that encourages trust, innovation, and employee autonomy while harnessing the benefits of advanced technology.

As organisations continue to implement AI monitoring, it is essential to recognise the importance of preserving employees' mental well-being, fostering innovation, and supporting a culture of genuine learning. While AI can undoubtedly contribute to enhanced efficiency, it should do so while upholding the trust and autonomy that are crucial for true professional growth.

Ultimately, the path forward in the age of AI monitoring lies in understanding both its strengths and its potential pitfalls and leveraging this understanding to create workplaces that are both productive and conducive to employee well-being.

Read full story

Topics: Technology, #HRCommunity, #ArtificialIntelligence, #HRTech

Did you find this story helpful?



How do you envision AI transforming your work?

Be Heard: Share Your Feedback and Recommend Our Content!

Selected Score :