People Matters Logo

One-size-does-not-fit-all: The new mantra of performance management

• By Radhika Changoiwala
One-size-does-not-fit-all: The new mantra of performance management

Performance Management is one of the most crucial and dreaded aspects of both employees and HR. A rigorous one-month saga that stresses every level within the organization, almost like a beast showing its ugly head each year.

The last decade, however, has been a promising one, with more companies shunning the rating and ranking system, the heavy administrative process and questioning the effectiveness of performance appraisals. There have been healthy discussions around productive feedback, continuous learning and ways to steer the conversation towards something more meaningful.

As organizations look to be more progressive and adopt this new-age thinking, what are some tenets that can successfully help organizations make this transition?

For example, instead of the traditional annual goals, managers should have quarterly discussions with employees to understand the relevance of their goals to the changing business context, while making changes as needed. This helps employees create effective goals and produce better results.

An employee with three years of experience may have entered the company with one specialist skill for example, SQL, but in a few years may have developed a multitude of skills given the digital boom, thereby gaining expertise in platforms like, MicroStrategy or PeopleSoft. Thus, it is smarter for employers to invest in learning rather than recruiting for the ‘dream’ candidate.

A coaching-focused relationship with the manager leads to high engagement among employees. Internal communication, regular pulse surveys, flexible processes, open-door policy and continuous learning programs are all important tools like never before.

For example, as a talent partner, I helped a company recreate their performance management process so that it is continuous, collaborative and objective by leveraging Workday, our HRMS tool. At the front end, managers could manage the 9-box grid in Workday to continuously evaluate individual performance. At the back-end, the information was being pulled through different Employee modules based on demographic data, goal completion status, and quarterly career discussion inputs. This helped in two ways: One, tracking historic performance of each employee and two, enabling healthy discussions between managers and employees.

Rather than having a set process, it is more beneficial for HR to provide a performance framework with general guidelines. Performance discussions need to be more fluid, have a deeper understanding of each role and recognize the different yardsticks for diverse roles within the organization.

In essence, the new age performance management system needs to infuse elements of simplicity, trust, a growth mindset and focus on individual employees. It needs to reflect the current times of change, flexibility, continuous improvement and two-way communication.